Children's Reasoning about Geometric Footprints
نویسندگان
چکیده
We explored preschool’s children’s understanding of the correspondence of 3-D objects and 2-D faces in a novel task. In the “footprints” task children were shown a geometric solid, such as a pyramid or a prism, and asked to select which shape the solid would make if it were dipped in ink and stamped on a piece of paper. Through a latent class analysis of children’s errors we found children differed significantly in their misconceptions about object structure. Three distinct classes of children emerged: children who could only match visible faces, children who believed solids have an ‘essential’ face irrespective of rotation, and children who differentiated faces based on a solid’s rotation. We examined the characteristics of children in each of these classes using a battery of spatial tasks and numeric tasks. Our results suggest errors found in older children’s and adults’ reasoning about geometric concepts develop prior to formal schooling.
منابع مشابه
Footprints in Local Reasoning
Local reasoning about programs exploits the natural local behaviour common in programs by focussing on the footprint that part of the resource accessed by the program. We address the problem of formally characterising and analysing the footprint notion for abstract local functions introduced by Calcagno, O’Hearn and Yang. With our definition, we prove that the footprints are the only essential ...
متن کاملExtrusion Approach Based on Non-Overlapping Footprints (EABNOF) for the Construction of Geometric Models and Topologies in 3D Cadasters
Extrusion is widely used to construct models in 3D cadasters. However, the basic extrusion approach only supports relatively simple conditions, and a 3D cadastral data model that supports extruded 3D models that are associated with their corresponding footprints is not available. In this paper, we present a new extrusion approach based on non-overlapping footprints (EABNOF) that supports relati...
متن کاملYoung children's explorations of average through informal inferential reasoning
This study situates children's early notions of average within an inquiry classroom to investigate the rich inferential reasoning that young children drew on to make sense of the questions: Is there a typical height for a student in year 3? If so, what is it? Based on their deliberations over several lessons, students' ideas about average and typicality evolved as meaning reasonable, contrary t...
متن کاملChildren's beliefs about everyday reasoning.
Two studies investigated children's metacognition about everyday reasoning, assessing how they distinguish reasoning from nonreasoning and "good" reasoning from "bad." In Study 1, 80 1st graders (6-7 years), 3rd graders (8-9 years), 5th graders (10-11 years), and adults (18+ years) evaluated scenarios where people (a) used reasoning, (b) solved problems with nonreasoning approaches, or (c) reac...
متن کاملThe Development of Diagnostic Reasoning about Uncertain Events between Ages 4–7
The present investigation examines the development of children's diagnostic reasoning abilities when such inferences involve belief revision about uncertain potential causes. Four- to 7-year-olds observed an event occur that was due to one of four potential causes. Some of those potential causes were revealed to be efficacious; others were revealed to be inefficacious, but there was always one ...
متن کامل